Am 2014-08-11 01:07, schrieb Daniel Naber: > On 2014-08-10 17:37, Silvan Jegen wrote: > >> If including the analyzed token readings is useful in other assertion >> messages as well, it may also be better to refactor the token reading >> code into its own function and making it less ad hoc. >> >> What do you think ? > > Thanks, I have committed your changes (plus some more newlines, to make > the output easier to read).
Thanks! Using fail directly is certainly better. Just for future reference: To discuss code changes, do you prefer opening a Github issue (with or without code) or should we send an email to this list? Maybe it would be best to automatically generate a mail to this dev list whenever a Github issue has been opened... Cheers, Silvan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
