What I mean is just making a list of token groups, good and bad. I'll try a different example:
hand some; wrong; handsome I hand some tools to; correct Another one: bene; wrong;been nota bene;correct It is a very compact way of defining very simple rules. I encounter rules that work fine, but for real tweaking to remove false alarms, they need extensive editing, and become quite complex because of the number of multi-token exceptions. This look more simple to me; just add the correct ones as exceptions to the general rule, and exeptions to that couple as well. Ruud > On 2014-08-19 09:14, R.J. Baars wrote: > >> bed : ok >> bed english : not ok => bad english > >> For some types of errors, I think it works better then current >> rule/exception type of check. > > I'm not sure I understand: do you suggest a different (more compact) way > to write down simple rules, or do you suggest an additional way of > matching? Because if the have a rule "bed English", there's no need to > define "bed" as correct... > > Regards > Daniel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Languagetool-devel mailing list > Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
