Thanks. I will give it a try tomorrow. (And check out your, probably better, solution; I am curious; never too old to learn ...)
Ruud > On 2014-09-17 09:06, R.J. Baars wrote: > >> Would anyone please check this? (And probably know a better way to do >> this?) > > I have committed a similar change, please give it a try. Rule > OT_BACKTICK failed after that, so I commented it out. > > Regards > Daniel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Want excitement? > Manually upgrade your production database. > When you want reliability, choose Perforce > Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Languagetool-devel mailing list > Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
