Artem Kachitchkine wrote: >> I'd appreciate feedback before I submit these to SAC to start PSARC >> review. (PSARC members, in particular -- I'm thinking these are fairly >> straight-forward full cases, because new APIs are being created. >> However, if I can get away with a fast-track, then I'd prefer to do >> that. So I'm soliciting your input! :-) >> > > Note that, strictly speaking, 1-pager is not required. Its role on the > big picture is twofold: > > - to flag other people in the company/community, "just letting y'all > know I intend to do this at some point in the future" > > - ask SAC triage team to assign it to one of the ARCs. > > In this case, you could save time by approaching an PSARC sponsor > directly. The fast track template is similar to 1-pager, but with lots > of cruft removed, and the interface table added. > > IMO for sdcard case you can get away with a fast track. Not so sure > about blk2scsa. >
Ok. I thought a 1-pager was required to initiate a full case. If one or both of these becomes a full case, then it will be the first I will have submitted. :-) If the sdcard APIs all remain "private" (project or otherwise) for Phase I, then you're probably correct. I think Phase II will require a full case though. > >> http://opensolaris.org/os/project/sdcard-drivers/blk2scsa-1pager/ >> > > >> 6.2. Cost of Effort: >> Development: 1 engineer-week >> Test Development: 1 engineer-week >> > > > Riiight :) > Actually, blk2scsa is just about done right now. If I'm off, it won't be by much. Though by the standard multiply by two and move to next order of magnitude, I should have said 2 months. :-) -- Garrett > -Artem > _______________________________________________ > driver-discuss mailing list > driver-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss >
