John Ireland wrote: > don't you just hate it when it fails! > :-)
Anyway, the crucial bit is this: Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 panic[cpu0]/thread=e1bc7880: Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 genunix: BAD TRAP: type=e (#pf Page fault) rp=e2990c3c addr=64 occurred in module "fuse" due to a NULL pointer dereference Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 unix: Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 unix: nautilus: Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 unix: #pf Page fault Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 unix: Bad kernel fault at addr=0x64 Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 unix: pid=991, pc=0xf9887211, sp=0x5, eflags=0x10286 Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 unix: cr0: 8005003b<pg,wp,ne,et,ts,mp,pe> cr4: 6d8<xmme,fxsr,pge,mce,pse,de> Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 unix: cr2: 64 Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 unix: cr3: 12364000 Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 unix: Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 unix: gs: 1b0 fs: eac30000 es: e2990160 ds: 160 Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 unix: edi: 2005 esi: ea106d40 ebp: e2990cc8 esp: e2990c74 Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 unix: ebx: eac37b30 edx: eac37b30 ecx: 1 eax: 0 Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 unix: trp: e err: 0 eip: f9887211 cs: 158 Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 unix: efl: 10286 usp: 5 ss: 0 Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 unix: Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 genunix: e2990b78 unix:die+93 (e, e2990c3c, 64, 0) Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 genunix: e2990c28 unix:trap+1442 (e2990c3c, 64, 0) Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 genunix: e2990c3c unix:cmntrap+7c (1b0, eac30000, e299) Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 genunix: e2990cc8 fuse:get_filehandle+331 (ea106d40, 2005, eac) Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 genunix: e2990cf4 fuse:fuse_open+2d (e2990da8, 2005, eac) Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 genunix: e2990d34 genunix:fop_open+a2 (e2990da8, 2005, eac) Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 genunix: e2990e54 genunix:vn_openat+633 (8525988, 0, 2005, 0) Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 genunix: e2990f44 genunix:copen+403 (ffd19553, 8525988, ) Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 genunix: e2990f64 genunix:openat+19 (ffd19553, 8525988, ) Aug 3 20:55:58 john-1 genunix: e2990f84 genunix:fsat32+ff (0, ffd19553, 852598) The stack trace at the bottom (reading from bottom to top) shows that we ended up in the fuse module (and in this case, the panic message identified this too). I'm not familar with fuse (so I've no idea how current 2009.4.4 is), but my guess is there is an incompatibility between the version you are running and the newly upgraded OS. Is there a later version you could try? If it's the version from http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/fuse/ then there is a "log a new bug" section, and you should include the above stack trace and your steps to reproduce (that you included in the first post). HTH Brian -- Brian Ruthven Solaris Revenue Product Engineering Sun Microsystems UK Sparc House, Guillemont Park, Camberley, GU17 9QG
