As timer is acurate. And also remember I measure whole frames with ethernet header. Depends what measures your meter. For long lived traffic (several seconds) you can expect about 1packet variation - it is 1% from rate for 100 packets. devik
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Justin Owens wrote: > Right...yeah...578 and 868 and I'm looking for 600 and 900 :-) > How accurate would you normally expect HTB to be ?? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Devera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 24 May 2002 18:47 > To: Justin Owens > Cc: lartc > Subject: Re: [LARTC] Some help please ! > > > Ehh and another hint, what is kbps in your mind ? BYTES or BITS ? > > On Fri, 24 May 2002, Justin Owens wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I am testing HTB using Iperf to generate traffic on a couple of ports and > > trying to shape the traffic. I am using the script following but my > results > > don't seem to make sense. > > I am seeing 4627Kbps on port 100 and 6944 on port 150. > > I'm sure there's a reasonable explaination for this but I can't find it ! > > > > Any help would be appreciated. > > > > Rgds. > > Justin > > > > > > tc qdisc del dev eth1 root > > > > tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 12 > > > > tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 600kbps ceil 600kbps > > tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 900kbps ceil 900kbps > > > > tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip dport > 100 > > 0xffff flowid 1:1 > > tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip dport > 150 > > 0xffff flowid 1:2 > > > > > > > > The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential, > intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is > addressed. If the reader of this email is not the intended recipient, you > are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this > email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, > please notify the sender immediately by email and delete this email. Any > views expressed in this email are those of the individual sender unless the > sender specifically states > > This mail was virus scanned by SurfControl. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > > > > > > > The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential, intended >only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader >of this email is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any >dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you >have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and >delete this email. Any views expressed in this email are those of the individual >sender unless the sender specifically states > This mail was virus scanned by SurfControl. > > > > _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
