On Monday 16 June 2003 19:07, Albert Martorell wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
> I've been trying with htb and tc filter. It seemed to work fine, but
> after testing with ethloop I've realized that traffic is not being
> distributed through the leaves as I thought. When sending packets to
> 1:10 and 1:11 at the same time, there's no bandwidth sharing. There's no
> traffic through 1:11 until traffic through 1:10 has finished. Though
> I've tried assigning different prio's, 1:10 always gets more
> bandwidth...
I also did some test and used ethloop But I had good restults. You can find
more info on
http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/tests/htb/parent/
> Here's the script that reproduces this behaviour:
>
> tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12 r2q 10
> tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 600kbit ceil
> 600kbit
> tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 200kbit ceil
> 600kbit
> tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb rate 200kbit ceil
> 600kbit
> tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:12 htb rate 200kbit ceil
> 600kbit
> tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 20: sfq perturb 10
> tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:11 handle 21: sfq perturb 10
> tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:12 handle 22: sfq perturb 10
>
> tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1: u32 match ip sport 53
> 0xffff flowid 1:10
> tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1: u32 match ip src 1.2.3.4
> match ip sport 80 0xffff flowid 1:11
I did my tests with ethloop on lo and you used eth0. Do you have a loopback
connecter installed on eth0?
Stef
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
