andreas, having one class per user seems cool... please buddy, have a sample script of that ? so, if i have 600kbit / 7 = 86kbit for each, is it that ??? if so, is it too few for a single user ? about something that i read that say "borrowing", when a user borrow his spare band to a "vampire", when will he gets it back when he needs it...?
thanks again ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andreas Klauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 11:20 AM Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb > Am Sunday 17 October 2004 15:02 schrieb James Lista: > > and about that you say take a look at ipp2p or l7-filter: errr, can > > they identify when a user changed edonkey or any other p2p default port > > and limit such packet even so ???? > > They try to. I'm using IPP2P and it works okay for me. > > Although my shaping setup is a little different from what you want to do. > I've got one class per user, so everyone gets the same share of bandwidth. > This way it doesn't matter what kind of traffic a user generates, as it > doesn't influence the others. > > Prioritization is then done within the user classes, the only effect of > that is that a user can still have a lag free SSH connection while he's > downloading stuff at the same time. > > So in my setup, if the user finds a way to trick the prioritization > settings, he's only tricking himself, because he can't escape his user > class :) > > Andreas > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
