DervishD wrote:
Hi Salim :)
* Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
I got this problem while trying to shape traffic with iptables MARK and
HTB.
MARK: targinfosize 8 != 4
--set-mark gives "invalid argument" error message.
Kernel version is 2.4.29 (some patches from patch o matic applied)
Iptables version 1.3.4
Intel x86 architecture.
I saw this problem discussed in a few places, but the discussions didn't
come to a conclusion or solution.
You've hit a bug in iptables :( I've notified in the bugzilla but
I have had no answers. You're building iptables with no shared
libraries (NO_SHARED_LIBS=1). This means that the code in iptables,
when loading the "modules" for the matches and targets is taking a
slightly different code path. The problem is that the MARK target
has two versions, 0 and 1, and kernel 2.4.x (at least until 31)
supports only version 0. If you don't use share libraries in
iptables, both versions are loaded and v1 is used instead of v2.
Unfortunately, v1 has a bigger data structure than v0 and your kernel
complaints.
That can't be the reason, all revisions of a single match/target are
in the same object file and the supported revision is (supposed to be)
probed. Salim, can you send a strace of the failing iptables command?
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
