Jody Shumaker wrote: > I don't believe -j CLASSIFY targte can target sub-classes. Pretty > sure you can only target classes whose parent is the root class of the > qdisc. You would need to use tc filters to do this, or get rid of your > redundant classes. For THB for some reason you have a root class and > a child class with the same limit? This makes no sense, you'd be fine > with just the 2:2 class and attaching the sfq to that, and setting the > classify to that. > > Otherwise, yes I think this would work in setting a limit on those ppp > devices as they come up to XXXkbit of bandwidth. > > - Jody
Actually it looks like it can target sub-classes: pppoe users ----- eth1-gw/router-eth0 ----- WAN/Internet For shaping pppoe users upload i do the following: attached a root qdisc to eth0 then attached a htb class to it (1:10 for example) Then i attach dynamicaly classes to 1:10 with numbers (1:91 for ppp1 for example) with parent 1:10. There are also dynamic iptables rules (alot of dynamic stuff going on .. lol ;) saying "traffic from that pppoe user going out trough eth0 CLASSIFY as 1:91" When a ppp43 is up, a class 1:943 with parent 1:10 will be attached to eth0 and iptables rule saying traffic from that pppoe user going out trough eth0 CLASSIFY as 1:943" and it seems to work fine, upload seems to be shaped at the desired rates. But that is in a "one pppoe user" test environment, i think it should work fine when deployed too, and each pppoe user will get their upload rates ;-) -- regards, Georgi Alexandrov Key Server = http://pgp.mit.edu/ :: KeyID = 37B4B3EE Key Fingerprint = E429 BF93 FA67 44E9 B7D4 F89E F990 01C1 37B4 B3EE
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
