On Thursday 02 March 2006 02:30, Russell Stuart wrote: > I have been trying to optimise my ADSL connections for VOIP. > Funny things were happening - for example increasing the ping > packet size by 50% had no effect, but then adding one byte > had a major effect. It took me a while to figure out that I > was seeing the effects of the fixed ATM cell size. <snip> > diff -Nur iproute-20051007.keep/tc/q_htb.c iproute-20051007/tc/q_htb.c > --- iproute-20051007.keep/tc/q_htb.c 2006-03-02 14:50:51.000000000 +1000 > +++ iproute-20051007/tc/q_htb.c 2006-03-02 15:50:31.000000000 +1000
Any chance something like this can be applied to q_tbf? It's been classful for a while and I find a tbf with a prio under it works quite well for my configuration. Jesper's patch indicates untested support for other schedulers including tbf, so it's certainly possible. Thanks. -- Jason Boxman http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
