Re: [LARTC] Class C network 223.255.255.x

[the sew]

Nothing wrong with the official, my backbone is expanding quite alot and we adding quite alot of businesses with cables in building, and we use pppoe and radus to asign ip addresses, just looking for a block of addresses that most companies will never use.

Sew

On 4/12/06, Erik Slagter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 14:52 +0200, the sew wrote:
> Most networks are using either 10.x.x.x or 172.x.x.x or 192.168.x.x ,
> but was curious If I can use the range 223.255.255.x for my backbone
> routing, this looks like a nice block to use as most ppl don't use
> this, specially if you build quite a big intranet
>
> what about the whole 223.x.x.x block, will this be used on the
> internet?

These are valid routable ip adresses, so you'd better not use them for
your own purposes.

What is wrong with the official private ranges?


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc