On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 03:52:39PM +0200, Torsten Luettgert wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 10:55 +0200, gerald HUET wrote:
> > [ 5333.870000] ip_tables: u32 match: invalid size 0 !=
> > 2028
> > iptables: Unknown error -1
> > 
> > I tried to do some modifications on ipt_u32.c
> > following  modifications which work for ipp2p
> > (http://www.sieglitzhof.net/~doc/ipp2p/) without any
> > succes. 
> 
> Hm, that should have worked - it's the same problem for
> all the little-maintained stuff in patch-o-matic.
> 
> > Does anyone have an explication why the problem occurs
> > whith the new kernel and how to solve it ?
> 
> The parameters to checkentry() and match() changed
> incompatibly between 2.6.16 and 2.6.17.
> 
> The u32 match in current SVN works with 2.6.17
> (but not with 2.6.16 or earlier).
> 
> You need to
> svn co http://svn.netfilter.org/netfilter/trunk/patch-o-matic-ng
> 
> then patch your kernel and recompile.

apply also patch from attachment. 2.6.17 needs matchsize in ipt_match struct.

triss:~# iptables -I FORWARD -p udp -m length --length 39 -m u32 --u32 
'27&0x8f=7' --u32 '31=0x527c4833' -j DROP

triss:~# iptables -L FORWARD -vn
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
 pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source destination         
    0     0 DROP       udp  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0           
length 39 u32 0x1f=0x527c4833 

seems working.

/pch



-- 
Dyslexia bug unpatched since 1977 ...
exploit has been leaked to the underground.
--- ipt_u32.c   2006-08-02 22:34:29.000000000 +0200
+++ /usr/src/linux-2.6.17.6/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_u32.c        2006-08-02 
22:45:43.000000000 +0200
@@ -217,6 +217,7 @@
 static struct ipt_match u32_match = { 
        .name           = "u32",
        .match          = &match,
+       .matchsize      = sizeof(struct ipt_u32),
        .checkentry     = &checkentry,
        .me             = THIS_MODULE
 };
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Reply via email to