On Friday 23 March 2007 11:04, Dan Cook wrote: > my idea is to use a bridge for the regular access and a route for the new > application access. Sat a bridge from eth0 to eth1 but routing to newlink > from eth0 to eth2. I would like to use the linux box as the firewall for > the newlink side of things.
More complex then probably needed: /------------firewall 192.168.0.1/24 (3/4 T) client-->(switching) hub \------------firewall 192.168.0.2/24 (NewLink) client(s) static routes: ip route add default via 192.168.0.1 ip route add <newlinkdstaddr> via 192.168.0.2 You could also use a different network (192.168.1.1/24) for Newlink and add a second address to the client(s) eth's , if that makes more sense. Dave _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc