I agree with Grant. Greg.
On 04 Μαϊ 2011, at 21:06 , Grant Taylor wrote: > On 05/04/11 12:03, Radu Oprisan wrote: >> I can set-up another mailing list in the morning (8 PM now, EEST). >> Think we can get somebody else to join? > > I'm not opposed to a new mailing list in and of its self. > > However I think that this list (LARTC) is well known and documented all over > the place. So even if we migrate elsewhere, there will still be people that > stumble on to this list. > > I've personally noticed, for the last couple of years, that this list would > be *EXTREMELY* delayed (as in weeks to months) for some unknown reason. - > As I look at headers of some of the recent messages, I see that a message sat > in the queue on the server for multiple months before being delivered to my > mail server. > > Seeing that now messages seem to be flowing in a timely manner, I'd suggest > that we give this list a week to a month probation to see if it has > straightened up it's act. > > I'd also like a comment from the list maintainer or a moderator in his / her > stead. > > Other than the above concern, I'll support moving to a new mailing list as > long as there are messages to this list (so that they can be found in > archives) indicating the move. > > > > Grant. . . . > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc > _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
