What Tucker said.
(And thanks, Tucker, for watching my back.)
I hope we've learned that "ant doc", or at the very least "ant
reference' (in docs/src) should be part of every pre-checkin test.
jrs
On Jan 9, 2006, at 7:01 PM, P T Withington wrote:
Two comments/questions:
Why do I want to declare a dataset in a node?
This will have doc impact, because of the hairy way the doc for the
LFC is generated from the shema, so you should test that the doc still
builds, and probably advise the doc guy about the change (you should
review node and view's doc pages to make sure they still make sense).
Approved if the doc builds sensibly.
On 9 Jan 2006, at 18:30, Jim Grandy wrote:
Change 36864 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2006/01/09 15:26:16 *pending*
Summary:Modify schema to consolidate node-specific element
definitions and reuse them within definition of both node and view.
Bugs Fixed: LPP-1148
Technical Reviewer: ptw (pending)
QA Reviewer: mdavis (pending)
Doc Reviewer: n/a
Details:Node and view were both deriving elements in part from
ObjectElements. Since view's capabilities should be a superset of
node's, it makes sense to define a NodeElements and use it in the
element definitions of both node and view. Arguably we should do this
with the other classes derived from node, but that will have to wait
for a more general revamping of the schema.
Tests:Smokecheck, Laszlo Explorer
Affected files ...
... //depot/lps-dev/WEB-INF/lps/schema/lzx.rnc#29 edit
<changeset-36864.zip>
_______________________________________________
Laszlo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
_______________________________________________
Laszlo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
