On 4/23/06, P T Withington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006-04-23, at 14:55 EDT, P T Withington wrote:
> components/debugger/library: use <switch> tag to not include
> component debugger for DHTML.
This doesn't actually work. I was wondering if you (Henry) had any
insight.
When I write the switch thusly:
<library>
<switch>
<when runtime="dhtml">
</when>
<otherwise>
<include href="" debugger.lzx"/>
</otherwise>
</switch>
</library>
The compiler issues all sorts of complaints
> 21 compilation warnings:
>
> debugger/debugger.lzx:74:31: element "resizelayout" not allowed in
> this context. Check whether it is spelled correctly, and whether a
> class with this name exists.
> debugger/debugger.lzx:87:36: element "stableborderlayout" not
> allowed in this context. Check whether it is spelled correctly, and
> whether a class with this name exists.
> debugger/debugger.lzx:460:30: element "dragstate" not allowed in
> this context. Check whether it is spelled correctly, and whether a
> class with this name exists.
(&c.)
I suspect there is something going on where the parser is parsing the
debugger file before the switch can decide not to compile it.
Perhaps the switch 'compilation' needs to actually happen at parse time.
The question remains whether we want or need to support this... it is
a primitive requires/provides, so seemed like a logical place to start.
_______________________________________________
Laszlo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
