Yeah, I think I already mentioned that way back in this thread. Why didn't you tell us this before we deleted it! :P
On 2006-06-30, at 16:07 EDT, Adam Wolff wrote: > Put back notifyingEvent! > > A > > On Jun 30, Max Carlson wrote: > >> FWIW this duplicates the current design (in SWF) which sends the >> onidle >> event regardless of if there are listeners. >> >> What do you think is the best way to find out that someone has >> registered for the event? I would just override Lzidle.addDelegate >> () to >> turn the idle timer back on, but the event isn't created until the >> first >> delegate is attached... >> >> -Max >> >> P T Withington wrote: >>> Do we have a separate bug that LzIdle should clear the interval >>> timer >>> when there are no listeners? >>> >>> On 2006-06-30, at 00:50 EDT, Max Carlson wrote: >>> >>>> Summary: LzIdle uses setInterval() instead of a movieclip >>>> >>>> New Features: >>>> >>>> Bugs Fixed: LPP-2269 - LzIdle should use setInterval() instead of a >>>> movieclip >>>> >>>> Technical Reviewer: jim >>>> QA Reviewer: henry >>>> Doc Reviewer: (pending) >>>> >>>> Documentation: >>>> >>>> Release Notes: >>>> >>>> Details: >>>> >>>> >>>> Tests: >>>> >>>> Files: >>>> M WEB-INF/lps/lfc/services/LzIdle.as >>>> M WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/compiler/SWFFile.java >>>> --Regards, >>>> Max Carlson >>>> OpenLaszlo.org >>>> <patch.mcarlson.1764.tgz> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Laszlo-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Laszlo-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev >> _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
