Should we name it something similar to highlight the fact that it's a subset of XHR? What are the differences?
-Max Henry Minsky wrote: > It doesn't quite match XMLHTTPRequest, so I'd rather not rename it > until it's really the same. > > On 7/22/06, *Max Carlson* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > lfc/kernel/LzHTTPLoad.lzs makes sense. Shall we rename this to > XMLHTTPRequest since it now emulates that API? > > -Max > > Henry Minsky wrote: > > > > I have some common code between two kernel implementations of the > same > > API, LzHTTPLoader.as and LzHTTPLoader.js . Where > > should I put the common code? It's code that is portable so that > would > > put it someplace in the LFC, but it is used by kernel code. > > I am not sure how to structure this -- the LHTTPLoader.as and .js > files > > define their own LzHTTPLoader objects and put methods > > on them. > > > > I'm thinking that this code could go into lfc/kernel, and be > #included > > by the individual runtime files (lfc/kernel/swf/LzHTTPLoad.as, and > > lfc/kernel/dhtml/LzHTTPLoader.js) > > > > > > -- > > Henry Minsky > > Software Architect > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > > > > > > -- > Henry Minsky > Software Architect > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
