Given the speculations elsewhere in this thread, perhaps you need to enhance your test slightly. Jim's comment about re-entering the event loop while waiting for an (onsensibly) synchnonous call to return seems like it matches the situation we were seeing in the profiler.
In particular, I wonder if you use setTimer and synchronous XHR, can the timer event run while the XHR is waiting for a reply? On 2006-08-30, at 15:45 EDT, Henry Minsky wrote: > Well, the test below does not show the main loop being interrupted > by the timer process; it shows the > reverse actually, the timer process does not seem to run while the > main loop is executing. [...] _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
