From what I understand you to say, I should expect node options to  
be inherited.  But this test case fails in trunk.  Am I confused, or  
are options completely broken?

<canvas debug="true">
   <include href="lzunit" />
   <class name="top" options="some: 'thing'" />
   <class name="middle" extends="top" options="other: 'else'" />
   <class name="bottom" extends="middle" options="besides: 'what'" />
   <middle id="m1">
     <bottom id="b1" options="last: 'end'">
     </bottom>
   </middle>

   <class name="Options" extends="TestCase">
     <method name="testOptions">
     <![CDATA[
       assertEquals('thing', b1.options['some']);
       assertEquals('else', b1.options['other']);
       assertEquals('what', b1.options['besides']);
       assertEquals('end', b1.options['last']);
       b1.setOption('other', 'another');
       assertEquals('else', m1.options['other']);
     ]]>
     </method>
   </class>

   <TestSuite>
     <Options />
   </TestSuite>
</canvas>



On 2006-09-21, at 18:52 EDT, Adam Wolff wrote:

> This looks good. Is there a test to make sure that instances get their
> class and superclass options? What about replicated views not  
> sharing a
> single options slot? The code looks correct, but those would be  
> nice to
> have.
>
> If there is strict enforcement of getter/setter-only access to  
> options,
> then maybe this would be a good time to rename the options slot to
> __LZoptions, especially since writing to that slot would be  
> catastrophic.
>
> A
>
> On Sep 21, P T Withington wrote:
>
>> And just let me know if it seems like the right solution?  It's a  
>> little
>> tricky, so I didn't want to check it in without a sanity check...
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: P T Withington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Date: 18 September 2006 15:09:06 EDT
>>> To: Adam Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> Subject: For Review: Change change.zpAulUWBZ.txt Summary: Make  
>>> node options
>>> type safe
>>>
>>> Change change.zpAulUWBZ.txt by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> /Users/ptw/pending-changes/ on 2006-09-18 13:07:00 EDT
>>>
>>> Summary: Make node options type safe
>>>
>>> Technical Reviewer: adam (pending)
>>> QA Reviewer: henry (pending)
>>> Doc Reviewer: (pending)
>>>
>>> Details:
>>>    Use a sentinel hash for options.  Replace the sentinel in the  
>>> setter.
>>>
>>> Tests:
>>>    Inspection
>>>
>>> Files:
>>> M      core/LzNode.lzs
>>


_______________________________________________
Laszlo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev

Reply via email to