Questions: 1) What is lzx-catalog? Is this something for packaging/ distribution? Could you check with Davis that it is really not needed?
2) Is there a missing modifier in this comment: > Note that this change does attempt to fix problems with controlling ? Otherwise, approved. On 2006-10-07, at 00:38 EDT, Benjamin Shine wrote: > Change change.Reltj8h6h.txt by [EMAIL PROTECTED] /Users/ben/src/svn/ > openlaszlo/branches/legals on 2006-10-06 21:20:39 PDT > > Summary: Clean up main build.xml without changing functionality > > New Features: > > Bugs Fixed: > > Technical Reviewer: ptw > QA Reviewer: jgrandy > Doc Reviewer: (pending) > > Documentation: > > Release Notes: > > Details: > This is simply a "no broken windows" change, which should not change > functional behavior, but only tidies up the main build.xml file. > > Several spurious, verbose "echo" statements were removed from the init > target. > > The "doc" target was cleaned up a bit, but not functionally > changed. It > still does not invoke the doc build; this is intentionally turned off > in legals. This change replaces the <?ignore ?> preprocessor > instruction > with a standard xml comment. > > Several old, used targets were hanging around in build.xml. This > change > removes the following three targets, which seem to not have been used > since the ant 1.6 upgrade: > lzx-catalog > commons-logging-to-tomcat > clean-commons-logging-from-tomcat > > Several condition elements were present in two places in the build > file; > this was a copy-and-paste error. Duplicate defintions of the following > condition elements have been removed: > tom.stop for windows and non-windows > tom.start for windows and non-windows > > Note that this change does attempt to fix problems with controlling > tomcat on windows. > > Tests: > > Files: > M build.xml > > <patch.ben.JcF3.tgz> _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
