On Oct 13, 2006, at 8:56 AM, P T Withington wrote:
Hm. This would work really well if we could get the d*mn mailing
list software to _not_ break links in its mad penchant to wrap lines.
The two example links you sent are the same.
The difference between the two links I gave are the plain url or
a call to svn export of that url -- click vs command line.
I am happy to use this mechanism now that I know I don't have to
sync to get the file.
Does this mean we don't need the laszlo-reviews mailing list after
all?
On 2006-10-12, at 19:07 EDT, Benjamin Shine wrote:
I just posted a few with this mechanism so you can try it out --
the review mail would say this:
Imported as http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/
patch.ben.BMaF.tgz
and if you click on that link, it downloads the tgz for you
You can also get the individual tar with
svn export http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/
patch.ben.BMaF.tgz
which gives you a non-version-controlled, vanilla tgz file.
-ben
On Oct 12, 2006, at 3:49 PM, Jim Grandy wrote:
Ah, but they don't have to sync. They just click on the link in the
email, and get a download dialog in their browser (at least, they
will if we construct the dialog correctly). It's actually less
error-
prone and more streamlined, because there's no possibility of
neglecting to add the patch to the review mail.
jim
On Oct 12, 2006, at 3:40 PM, P T Withington wrote:
I think this proposal stores less bits on hard drives but makes the
reviewer's job more complicated (they have to sync to get the
review changes). I prefer the existing mechanism. If there were
some way to tell the mailing list not to archive attachments,
perhaps that would be a good compromise?
On 2006-10-12, at 15:07 EDT, Jim Grandy wrote:
I just remembered we had a possibly-complementary proposal on the
table as well:
Modify the review tools to check the changeset in to Subversion
instead of sending it as an email attachment.
So svn-review would do a
svn import patch.ptw.xPLr.tgz http://svn.openlaszlo.org/
openlaszlo/patches/patch.ptw.xPLr.tgz
And add a link to the patch to the review email:
http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/patch.ptw.xPLr.tgz
The argument is that we would then be storing the patch once,
rather than transporting and storing it for each member of
whichever list it goes to. And yes, these files would live on in
Subversion, but that's arguably better than living on in many,
many email archives.
jim
On Oct 12, 2006, at 11:45 AM, P T Withington wrote:
We've had a few complaints about the 'review mail' noise on the
laszlo-dev mailing list, especially the large attachments that go
with the review submission. If no one objects, I plan to
create a
new list <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for review mail
(and
ask that reviewers direct their review requests there). If
members
of this list want to continue to receive review mail, they will
need
to join the new list.
I'll send mail to the list when the new one is set up and
ready to
accept subscriptions.
P T Withington
OpenLazslo.ORG <http://www.openlaszlo.org>
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] skype:ptwithy aim:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Laszlo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
_______________________________________________
Laszlo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
_______________________________________________
Laszlo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
