Yes. That is its contract. We emulate it in DHTML. Personally, I
would like to see us eliminate getTimer and use the standard/portable
`(new Date).getTime()`. (I've proposed a finer-grained clock for
ES4, Date.tick/Date.tickScale, which we should use if/when adopted.)
On 2006-10-16, at 22:10 EDT, Henry Minsky wrote:
Does the getTimer() value that is sent in LzIdle events start from
zero when the LFC is loaded?
On 10/16/06, Henry Minsky < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:At the
bug scrub we talked about getting some updated performance
benchmarks , are these assigned with some high priorty?
There's a number of proposed optimizations that are in JIRA which
would be easier to attack if we had a simple set of metrics we
could run. A couple of issues involve app startup time, is that
adequately covered by the existing inittimer tag ?
--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
