Are you sure? That change shouldn't have affected the lfc or anything. It just properly turns off the refguide build!

jgrandy-pb:~/dev/svn/openlaszlo/branches/legals jgrandyw$ svn diff -r 2989
Index: docs/src/build.xml
===================================================================
--- docs/src/build.xml  (revision 2989)
+++ docs/src/build.xml  (working copy)
@@ -192,11 +192,17 @@
   <target name="lfc.dbk.dep">
<!-- essentially a copy of the same target in ${lfc.dir}/ build.xml, but I'm
          not sure what else to do -->
- <uptodate property="lfc.dbk.uptodate" targetfile="${lfc.dbk.dir}/ LaszloLibrary.dbk">
-        <srcfiles dir="${lfc.dir}" includes="**/*.lzs" />
-        <srcfiles dir="${lfc.dir}" includes="**/*.as" />
-        <srcfiles dir="${lfc.dir}" includes="**/*.js" />
-    </uptodate>
+   <echo message="skip.doc.reference is ${skip.doc.reference}"/>
+    <condition property="lfc.dbk.uptodate">
+        <or>
+          <isset property="skip.doc.reference"/>
+          <uptodate targetfile="${lfc.dbk.dir}/LaszloLibrary.dbk">
+            <srcfiles dir="${lfc.dir}" includes="**/*.lzs" />
+            <srcfiles dir="${lfc.dir}" includes="**/*.as" />
+            <srcfiles dir="${lfc.dir}" includes="**/*.js" />
+          </uptodate>
+        </or>
+    </condition>
   </target>

   <target name="reference" description="Build the reference"
Index: build-tools/build-opt.xml
===================================================================
--- build-tools/build-opt.xml   (revision 2989)
+++ build-tools/build-opt.xml   (working copy)
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
     <property name="skip.prefetch" value="true" />
     <!-- property name="skip.wrappertest" value="true" -->
     <!-- <property name="skip.runlzunit" value="true" -->
-    <property name="skip.doc.reference" value="true" />
+<?ignore    <property name="skip.doc.reference" value="true" /> ?>

     <property name="done.build-opt" value="true" />
</target>

jim

On Dec 9, 2006, at 3:31 PM, P T Withington wrote:

Gah!

On 2006-12-09, at 18:07 EST, Philip Romanik wrote:

The error is coming from 2989, one of Jim's comment-change updates.

2988 doesn't show the error, and 2989 does.


I did a clean checkout/build and got the same behavior. Must be a Windows
issue.

Phil

>Weird.  I am not seeing it in my playpen.
>
>On 2006-12-09, at 16:22 EST, Philip Romanik wrote:
>
> > Hi Tucker,
> >
> > I applied both and they don't address this issue. I'll see if I can > > narrow the problem down a bit. These problems crept in during the
> > past couple of days.
> >
> >
> > Phil
> >



Reply via email to