Yes yes yes!!! This is something we've wanted to do for a long time.
Making this change without preserving backward compatibility will have a
lot of fallout, so we should deprecate the old format (and maybe warn)
if we do this.
-Max
P T Withington wrote:
I'd rather change lz(request)t(ype) to lzw(rapper). Better yet, we've
discussed a number of times trying to unify the lz? options, perhaps by
saying something like:
?lzoptions=runtime:dhtml,wrapper:html,debug:false,proxy:true
[I don't know for a fact that that is or is not a legitimate URI query
parameter syntax, or if : and , already have reserved meanings in query
parameters. Presumably we could come up with something along those lines.]
Similarly, the litany of server requests that are lumped into the ?lzt
argument should be split out as something like:
?lzoptions=request:clear-cache
etc.
The biggest benefit is that we would remove a lot of pollution from the
query arg space (especially the non-lz-prefixed args like profile,
proxy, etc.).
If `runtime:dhtml,wrapper:html` is still confusing, I suggest we change
dhtml to ajax.
On 2007-01-18, at 20:36 EST, David Temkin wrote:
With the addition of lzr=dhtml, lzt=html has become pretty confusing.
Any thoughts on deprecating lzt=html in favor of lzt=wrapper, or
something along those lines?
--
Regards,
Max Carlson
OpenLaszlo.org
