We want to discourage the use of .classname too, especially if it is
being used where `instanceof` would suffice. I'd be interested in why
you thought you needed .classname.
On 2007-10-29, at 11:26 EDT, Elliot Winard wrote:
I have code that uses .classname but nothing that uses .class.
-e
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 2:13 PM, P T Withington wrote:
I believe we added that for CSS but never implemented it. (Does our
CSS support .class selectors?) Henry and I could not see where it
was used, so we removed it. If you know otherwise, speak up.
On Oct 26, 2007, at 22:42, Benjamin Shine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
In lps3 docs, we list LzNode.class and describe it as "The CSS
class of a node" -- see http://www.openlaszlo.org/lps3/docs/reference/node.html
This comment came from the schema -- in lzx.rnc in old trunk:
classAttribute =
## The CSS class of a node
[lza:modifiers="final"]
attribute class {token}
In lps4, I don't think we still have this attribute. If I'm right,
this is an API change.
Tucker, is this an API change?
This is being tracked as LPP-4973:
http://jira.openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-4973
-ben
