The main thing that changed since the last measurement was making the
core classes into sealed classes, and then wrapping them with a
dynamic shell class
LzNode, LzView, etc.

On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 5:02 PM, P T Withington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Phew!
>
>
>
>  On 2008-02-12, at 16:40 EST, Henry Minsky wrote:
>
>  > Oops, right, the swf9 should be the faster one.
>  >
>  > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Donald Anderson
>  > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >> Henry,
>  >>
>  >> I hope you have the headings reversed - looks like SWF9 takes
>  >> longer...
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> On Feb 12, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Henry Minsky wrote:
>  >>
>  >>> So, working around that compiler bug
>  >>> <canvas width="1000" height="600">
>  >>>   <handler name="oninit">
>  >>>       var i;
>  >>>       i = 1000;
>  >>>       var starttime;
>  >>>       starttime = getTimer();
>  >>>       while (i > 0) {
>  >>>           i--;
>  >>>           new lz.view(canvas, {x: i, y: i});
>  >>>       }
>  >>>
>  >>>       new lz.text(canvas,{x:0, y:20, text: 'elapsed time:
>  >>> '+getTimer()});
>  >>>       var ctime;
>  >>>       ctime = getTimer() - starttime;
>  >>>       new lz.text(canvas,{x:0, y:30, text: ('initialize new views
>  >>> time: '+ctime )} );
>  >>>   </handler>
>  >>> </canvas>
>  >>>
>  >>>
>  >>>
>  >>> SWF8
>  >>> total elapsed time 137 msec
>  >>> creating views: 97 msec
>  >>>
>  >>> SWF9
>  >>> total elapsed time 450 msec
>  >>> creating views:  270 msec
>  >>>
>  >>> So it looks like a speedup of about three from swf8 to swf9 for view
>  >>> creation.
>  >>>
>  >>>
>  >>>
>  >>>
>  >>> --
>  >>> Henry Minsky
>  >>> Software Architect
>  >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> --
>  >>
>  >> Don Anderson
>  >> Java/C/C++, Berkeley DB, systems consultant
>  >>
>  >> voice: 617-547-7881
>  >> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >> www: http://www.ddanderson.com
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > Henry Minsky
>  > Software Architect
>  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



-- 
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to