One last tweak:

  obj.hasOwnProperty("$lsc$Fcn_dependencies")

should be:

  "$lsc$Fcn_dependencies" in obj

I think. Because the dependency function might be defined in a superclass of obj?

This idiom is effectively Lisp :send-if-handles

On 2008-03-04, at 10:43 EST, Donald Anderson wrote:

Change 20080304-dda-Q by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2008-03-04 10:32:20 EST
   in /Users/dda/laszlo/src/svn/openlaszlo/trunk
   for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk

Summary: In dependency calculation function, use bracket syntax rather than cast

New Features:

Bugs Fixed: LPP-5335

Technical Reviewer: ptw (pending)
QA Reviewer: (pending)
Doc Reviewer: (pending)

Documentation:

Release Notes:

Details:
   Previously, the new Compiler.dependenciesForExpression would
   produce an expression like:

obj.hasOwnProperty("$lsc$Fcn_dependencies") ? (obj cast Object). $lsc$Fcn_dependencies(this, obj, arg1)

For consistency with other cases that must do 'typeless' references, this has been changed
   to use the bracket notation:

obj.hasOwnProperty("$lsc$Fcn_dependencies") ? obj['$lsc $Fcn_dependencies'](this, obj, arg1)

Tests:
  Checked regressions:  (smokecheck, weather, lzpix) x (swf8, dhtml)
The feature itself cannot be easily checked until this function is used
  within the new constraint framework.

Files:
M WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/sc/ ReferenceCollector.java

Changeset: http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20080304-dda-Q.tar



--

Don Anderson
Java/C/C++, Berkeley DB, systems consultant

voice: 617-547-7881
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.ddanderson.com





Reply via email to