Can you see what this test case does:
dynamic class top {
prototype.options = {};
}
class middle extends top {}
var test = new middle;
test.options === test['constructor'].prototype.options;
I think the syntax will be slightly different in JS2, but it will
continue to work. I think for now this will be the best way to
implement options, unless we find that making our classes all dynamic
kills performance.
On 2008-03-20, at 15:47 EDT, Henry Minsky wrote:
I'm not sure what this['constructor'].prototype.options will return in
swf9. I can try it with a small test case,
but maybe is there a way to do this
that doesn't need to use .prototype?
function $lzc$set_options(hash) {
// Ensure you have your own private options dictionary, not the one
// inherited from your class, nor the default empty one inherited
// from LzNode!
if (this.options === this['constructor'].prototype.options) {
this.options = new LzInheritedHash(this.options);
}
for (var key in hash) {
this.options[ key ] = hash[key];
}
}
--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
