Re: [Laszlo-dev] some other goodies when I try to compile a checkbox

[Philip Romanik]

FYI, I've been adding an optional argument to the destroy methods in 
the data objects to get around this issue.



Compiler error: at 
[/tmp/lzswf9/lzgen55150/$lzc$<http://class_basecomponent.as>class_basecomponent.as:
230]: Error: Incompatible override.

override function destroy () {
                 ^

This is because we're not matching the destroy() method signature because
of  the secret "recursiveCall" arg that LzNode.destroy uses

function destroy( recursiveCall = null){

That's a source change right?


Yes, but I don't really want to change all the classes in the LFC 
and in the component libraries (and random user apps) that define 
a  destroy()  method to give them  an optional argument.

I wonder if we could make it so that destroy()  method on LzNode 
takes no args, and then have
some other internal "destroy" method that takes the extra arg.