I like this solution better than the magic/optional force flag.

The whole bit about overriding setters boils down to fixing http://jira.openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-5587 which is next on my list.

On 2008-07-23, at 04:30EDT, André Bargull wrote:

Maybe we should just change the setText()-API and remove the internal argument "force".
function setText ( t, *force = null*){

For instance by adding a private "__textdirty"-flag to LzText:
var __textdirty :Boolean = false;

function setText ( t ){
   // force to a string
   t = '' + t;
   if (!this.__textdirty && t == this.getText()) return;
   this.__textdirty = false;

Then we need to update setMaxLength(), setFontName() and setFontSize() to set "__textdirty" to true. (I didn't see any other callers which use the force-flag, I've searched in the LFC & components.)
Thoughts?

Actually, I don't know if calling super.setAttribute is going to do the right thing, maybe the mySetText method needs to call the super setter explicitly? <text name="alerttext" x="${parent.text_x}" y="$ {parent.text_y}" resize="true" multiline="true"> <attribute name="text" type="text" value="${parent.text}" setter="this.mySetText(text)"/> <method name="mySetText" args="t"> .... super.$lzc$set_text(t); </method> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Henry Minsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  I came across this code in the alert component
> <text name="alerttext" x="${parent.text_x}" y="$ {parent.text_y}"
>             resize="true" text="${parent.text}" multiline="true">
>             <method name="setText" args="t">
>                 super.setText(t);
>                  ....
>
>
> which gets a swf9 error about an incompatible override, and in fact that's
> true, LzText.setText is defined as
> having a second optional arg
>
> LzText.setText is actually deprecated, and it has the method signature
>
>      function setText ( t, force = null){
>
> So what is the right way for user code to override the text setter on
> LzText? It seems like for
> one thing you should not need to know about the magic second arg. I don't
> think we want people
> to have to do
>
> <method name="$lzc$set_text" args="v">
> either..
>
>
> Is the approved way to ask them to declare the setter as an attribute?
>
> <text>
>    <attribute name="text" setter="..."
>
> So for alert code shown above, we need to move that text=$ {parent.text}
> constraint to the attribute declaration, and it becomes
>
> <text name="alerttext" x="${parent.text_x}" y="$ {parent.text_y}"
>             resize="true" multiline="true">
> <attribute name="text" type="text" value="$ {parent.text}"
> setter="this.mySetText(text)"/>
>             <method name="mySetText" args="t">
>                 ....
>                 super.setAttribute('text',t);
>              </method>



Reply via email to