approved! We had better check all our class constructors code for this screw case in any cases where the super call is not the first call in the constructor.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 6:17 PM, André Bargull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yep. > > > On 7/24/2008 12:03 AM, Henry Minsky wrote: >> >> So was the failure happening because the values that were getting set >> in the constructor were getting >> reinitialized during the super() call? >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:45 PM, André Bargull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Change 20080708-bargull-rwY by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2008-07-08 >>> 20:14:02 >>> in /home/Admin/src/svn/openlaszlo/trunk >>> for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk >>> >>> Summary: replication-manager takes datapath-slot in swf9 >>> >>> New Features: >>> >>> Bugs Fixed: LPP-6539 >>> >>> Technical Reviewer: ptw >>> QA Reviewer: hminsky >>> Doc Reviewer: (pending) >>> >>> Documentation: >>> >>> Release Notes: >>> >>> Details: >>> moved some code and learned that swf9 initializes _all_ class members in >>> the >>> constructor (in constrast to a prototype based system). >>> >>> >>> Tests: >>> attached at bugreport >>> >>> Files: >>> M WEB-INF/lps/lfc/data/LzReplicationManager.lzs >>> M WEB-INF/lps/lfc/data/LzLazyReplicationManager.lzs >>> >>> Changeset: >>> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20080708-bargull-rwY.tar >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > -- Henry Minsky Software Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
