It still says lz.[tagname] in the prose in one spot. The '.' is
erroneous. Probably `tagname` should be in whatever markup we use to
me "symbolic representation of some tag", which I would hope to be
rendered as italics.
I think the confusion is that I may have said something like:
For any tag `frobozz`, `lz.frobozz` is equivalent to `lz['frobozz']`,
and the markup is maybe confused about whether `tagname` is a literal
name or just a symbolic representation of any tag?
On 2008-11-21, at 09:05EST, Lou Iorio wrote:
Change 20081121-lou-z by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2008-11-21 10:01:27 AST
in /Users/lou/src/svn/openlaszlo/trunk
for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk
Summary: dguide, Chapter 33. Extending Classes: update section on
instantiating classes in script
Bugs Fixed: LPP-7374
Technical Reviewer: henry, tucker
QA Reviewer: (pending)
Doc Reviewer: (pending)
Tests: visual verify
Files:
M docs/src/developers/classes-powerprogramming.dbk
Changeset: http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20081121-lou-z.tar
