That's a good idea..

On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:08 AM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think a better idea would be to put a 'force recompile' button on the
> developer console.
>
> On 2009-02-16, at 06:29EST, Lou Iorio wrote:
>
>> This was in quick-index.html in the form of the Admin console link, which
>> was also in
>> laszlo explorer. It was removed from all three places when we removed the
>> Admin console.
>> Perhaps I was over-zealous?
>>
>> The internal index did not have a link to the Admin console, but had
>> individual links that
>> look like this:
>>
>> <li><a href="foo.lzx?lzt=clearcache&amp;pwd=laszlo">Clear cache</a></li>
>>
>> If we need to bring any of this stuff back, I would prefer to put it in
>> quick-index.html,
>> laszlo explorer, or both, and get rid of index.jsp.
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Henry Minsky <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> There was at one time a link to clear the server cache on the
>>> "internal" index, which I think wasn't on the 'release' index. We
>>> ought to have some kind of page that is easy to find that tells
>>> developers this magic
>>> incantation, at least if a developer gets to the point they are brave
>>> enough to recompile the LFC.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 12:10 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> As best I can tell, /index.jsp is intended to be useful to 'internal
>>>> development' by having more stuff than the distribution index (which is
>>>> a
>>>> filtered copy of quick-index, which is a styled copy of the explorer
>>>
>>> nav).
>>>>
>>>> Having a different index for internal vs. distribution builds is
>>>
>>> confusing
>>>>
>>>> and probably just asking for trouble.
>>>>
>>>> If no one cares about this differentiation any more, lets get rid of the
>>>> .jsp and just generate /index.html directly from the explorer nav,
>>>> appropriately styled and filtered.
>>>>
>>>> DEVELOPERS:  Speak now if you want to keep index.jsp!
>>>>
>>>> On 2009-02-15, at 11:27EST, Lou Iorio wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So what's your opinion on this? I would have though this could have
>>>>> been moved as part of LPP-7756.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm building not to check that out.
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: Lou Iorio <[email protected]>
>>>>> Date: Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 3:49 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Laszlo-dev] link to release notes from trunk nightly
>>>
>>> broken
>>>>>
>>>>> To: P T Withington <[email protected]>
>>>>> Cc: OpenLaszlo Developers <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Filed as http://www.openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-7756
>>>>>
>>>>> On a similar subject, there is a file trunk/index.jsp with the title
>>>>> "Internal Index for trunk", which is nearly identical to
>>>
>>> quick-index.html,
>>>>>
>>>>> but not as up to date. This is what you see if you point your browser
>>>>> at
>>>>> trunk. It seems like that can go away, and quick-index.html
>>>>> renamed to the more standard index.html.
>>>>>
>>>>> This file is generated by quick-index.xslt, which should probably go
>>>
>>> into
>>>>>
>>>>> docs/src/xsl.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/14/09, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, the nightly build does something completely different. I need to
>>>>>> move
>>>>>> what the nightly does to our normal build process so there are less
>>>>>> surprises. I will probably end up moving the notes (and other .txt
>>>
>>> files)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> doc/src so they can be moved up to top level by the build.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As a bonus, when the files are moved, I will replace the keywords
>>>>>> @VERSIONID@, etc. with the actual numbers. I hope to have a change for
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> to review by tomorrow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It would be great if you could file a bug to track this. Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 14, 2009, at 9:12, Lou Iorio <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The link to the release notes from here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://labs.openlaszlo.org/trunk-nightly/index.html>
>>>>>> http://labs.openlaszlo.org/trunk-nightly/index.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> gives a 404 error. I moved release-notes.html last week from
>>>>>> trunk/docs
>>>>>> to trunk, and the link works in trunk, so something apparently needs
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> updated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Henry Minsky
>>> Software Architect
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>
>



-- 
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[email protected]

Reply via email to