On 7/10/2009 4:42 PM, P T Withington wrote: > On 2009-07-10, at 10:04EDT, P T Withington wrote: > >> On 2009-07-10, at 09:51EDT, André Bargull wrote: >> >>> On 7/10/2009 3:20 PM, P T Withington wrote: >>>> 1) Should input text resize default to true? If so, what does >>>> that mean? (Since, as we see, you can't enter anything if it is >>>> initially empty). >>>> >>> >>> Hmm, you wanted it to default to true: >>> "http://www.openlaszlo.org/pipermail/laszlo-dev/2008-June/015718.html"; >> >> Thanks for reminding me! >> >> [...] >> >> How do we reconcile this? > > Wait. I am officially confused. Despite what I said in the email that > you referenced, if you look at the change set it says: > > [...] > > Not sure how to untangle this. It seems that in evolving the sprite's > we moved the resizing behavior out of the kernel, up to generic code, > and up to the <text> superclass. In the interim, it seems that the > defaulting of resize to `false` for inputtext got lost. And the change > by Max that Henry's binsearch found just made it finally take effect.
Maybe we should just start to do what you've proposed in January and make this matrix => "http://www.openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-7577?focusedCommentId=49355#action_49355";. Then we can clean up all the whole init-arg processing in text/inputtext and textsprite/inputtextsprite to make it more consistent and fail-safe (LPP-6065). > > --- > > So, I withdraw my objection to Henry's proposed change, since it seems > to be restoring original intent (not that I am a strict constructionist, > just that I can now see that his change is _not_ an API change). > > > > _______________________________________________ Laszlo-reviews mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-reviews
