Doh! Approved.
On 2009-09-03, at 20:43, Max Carlson wrote: > I realized I could do this by using the existing test the first pass > through the loop. > > P T Withington wrote: >> Don't you want to first check that the view you start with contains >> the >> point, before you start walking the parents? That would seem more >> optimal. >> >> On 2009-09-03, at 15:31, Max Carlson wrote: >> >>> Change 20090901-maxcarlson-b by maxcarl...@bank on 2009-09-01 >>> 17:42:31 >>> PDT >>> in /Users/maxcarlson/openlaszlo/trunk-clean >>> for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk >>> >>> Summary: Fix LzView.containsPt() to handle clipped and invisible >>> items >>> >>> Bugs Fixed: LPP-8379 - mousetrack events act as if clip attribute >>> would not exist >>> >>> Technical Reviewer: ptw >>> QA Reviewer: [email protected] >>> >>> Details: LzTrack - Use LzView.containsPt() to determine if items >>> should be tracked. >>> >>> LaszloView - Update containsPt() to check for invisible and masked >>> parents' bounds. >>> >>> Tests: See LPP-8379. >>> >>> Files: >>> M WEB-INF/lps/lfc/services/LzTrack.lzs >>> M WEB-INF/lps/lfc/views/LaszloView.lzs >>> >>> Changeset: >>> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20090901-maxcarlson-b.tar >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Laszlo-reviews mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-reviews >> > > _______________________________________________ > Laszlo-reviews mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-reviews _______________________________________________ Laszlo-reviews mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-reviews
