Where do we stand on getting André's Calendar stuff working on labs.openlaszlo.org/trunk-nightly? (Which is running tomcat 5.5.23.)
On 2010-03-31, at 13:06, André Bargull wrote: > > On 3/31/2010 6:35 PM, P T Withington wrote: >> I confused you. There are two tomcats. One runs the nightly builds on >> labs.openlaszlo.org/lps-*-nightly. Everything for each lps nightly runs on >> that 5.5.23 tomcat, which I describe below. >> >> There is a second tomcat that runs the official release builds to support >> documentation an demonstrations on the openlaszlo web site. E.g., >> http://openlaszlo.org/lps_demos/ is kept up to date with a copy of the >> latest release of OL. This is the server I was calling the 'demos' server. >> Sorry for the confusion. Maybe it would be better to call this the >> 'release' server. > > Ah, okay understood now. > >> >> In any case, we don't need to worry about the 'release' server for now, >> although we will have to once we make a release with your change in it. >> Perhaps the simplest solution there will be to simply upgrade it to run >> 5.5.23 also. >> >> But, I think I have lost track as to where we stand with getting the nightly >> build to work on labs? > > Well, then downloading the nightly builds tomcat to try to run it in a local > environment. This is a rather simple plan, but since I don't know about each > and every configuration for Tomcat servers, this should be the easiest way to > find out whether there is Tomcat configuration issue. > > > >> >> On 2010-03-31, at 12:10, André Bargull wrote: >> >>> A different idea: >>> Do you think it's possible to zip and download the complete demos tomcat, >>> maybe this helps to reproduce the failure in a local environment. >>> >>> >>> On 3/31/2010 1:05 AM, André Bargull wrote: >>>> That's also the default installation >>>> for apache-tomcat-5.5.23, no files were added nor removed. You said the >>>> demos are hosted on a different Tomcat server, maybe there is some >>>> difference compared to the default installation. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 3/31/2010 12:26 AM, P T Withington wrote: >>>>> This is whats in the labs tomcat common: >>>>> >>>>> [las...@openlaszlo common]$ ls -l * >>>>> classes: >>>>> total 0 >>>>> >>>>> endorsed: >>>>> total 0 >>>>> >>>>> i18n: >>>>> total 144 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 laszlo laszlo 39689 Mar 5 2007 tomcat-i18n-en.jar >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 laszlo laszlo 33343 Mar 5 2007 tomcat-i18n-es.jar >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 laszlo laszlo 30084 Mar 5 2007 tomcat-i18n-fr.jar >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 laszlo laszlo 35529 Mar 5 2007 tomcat-i18n-ja.jar >>>>> >>>>> lib: >>>>> total 2196 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 laszlo laszlo 112341 Mar 5 2007 commons-el.jar >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 laszlo laszlo 408133 Mar 5 2007 jasper-compiler.jar >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 laszlo laszlo 1213732 Mar 5 2007 jasper-compiler-jdt.jar >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 laszlo laszlo 76844 Mar 5 2007 jasper-runtime.jar >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 laszlo laszlo 50952 Mar 5 2007 jsp-api.jar >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 laszlo laszlo 163490 Mar 5 2007 naming-factory-dbcp.jar >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 laszlo laszlo 31963 Mar 5 2007 naming-factory.jar >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 laszlo laszlo 47730 Mar 5 2007 naming-resources.jar >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 laszlo laszlo 99235 Mar 5 2007 servlet-api.jar >>>>> >>>>> I.e., it has _no_ jars in common/endorsed. Do we know what we really >>>>> want there? >>>>> >>>>> On 2010-03-30, at 18:03, P T Withington wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> labs.openlaszlo.org is running Apache Tomcat/5.5.23, but the tomcat that >>>>>> serves up demos, docs and releases is running Apache Tomcat/5.0.28 >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2010-03-30, at 13:53, André Bargull wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Which java version is used? According to the java docs [1], the 2nd >>>>>>> argument is of type Object and by auto-boxing, an integer value should >>>>>>> work. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/javaee/5/docs/api/javax/servlet/jsp/JspContext.html#setAttribute%28java.lang.String,%20java.lang.Object%29 >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>
