My reading of your change is that instead of just catching a SecurityError in the inner block, you are now catching all errors (did you mean that?) Since you catch all errors and ignore them, you don't really need the flag on the outer block -- it will never see the errors the inner block caught -- but if the inner block did catch an error, now the outer block will _also_ ignore errors (because the flag is set).
I guess I really don't understand what you are trying to do here. On 2010-04-19, at 18:36, Max Carlson wrote: > No, I'm just ensuring an error that's supposed to be ignored is ignored. > Other errors will still show up. > > The inner try/catch block is supposed to explicitly catch this kind of error. > Perhaps the behavior of nested try/catch blocks changed in when we updated > the flex compiler? > > Regards, > Max Carlson > OpenLaszlo.org > > On 4/19/10 2:57 PM, P T Withington wrote: >> So, you are just ignoring _all_ errors in the loader now? >> >> On 2010-04-19, at 17:15, Max Carlson wrote: >> >>> Change 20100419-maxcarlson-r by maxcarl...@friendly on 2010-04-19 14:05:21 >>> PDT >>> in /Users/maxcarlson/openlaszlo/trunk-clean >>> for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk >>> >>> Summary: Suppress loaderEventHandler warnings in swf9 >>> >>> Bugs Fixed: LPP-8923 - AGP-73257-793: "WARNING: loaderEventHandler... Error >>> #2099" comes when compiling only in swf9 >>> >>> Technical Reviewer: hminsky >>> QA Reviewer: [email protected] >>> >>> Details: Add flag to ensure security warnings are ignored. >>> >>> Tests: See testcase at LPP-8923 under swf9 >>> >>> Files: >>> M WEB-INF/lps/lfc/kernel/swf9/LzSprite.as >>> >>> Changeset: >>> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20100419-maxcarlson-r.tar >>> >>
