Every instance-allocated "var" declaration is in "__ivars__", so that
includes "var onx", too.
Concerning your statement in JIRA:
But if I can generate a more correct schema without relying on the developer
getting the documentation just right, I would rather do that.
The schema pretty relies on doc comments, especially the @lzxtype is
really important - not only for identifying events.
On 1/14/2011 11:57 PM, P T Withington wrote:
Holy smokes, where do they come from?
I will re-open.
But I had to check in to get a build because of other dependencies.
[Of course, the way our event system currently works, you are allowed to listen
for any event you like. It does not have to 'exist'. Not that this is a
feature we want or need to preserve. It's just the way things currently work.]
On 2011-01-14, at 17:06, André Bargull wrote:
Not approved.
Did you take a look at the newly generated schema file? There are now a bunch
of<event>s declared which don't actually exist.
[...]
<event final="true" name="ononx"/>
<event final="true" name="onony"/>
[...]
On 1/14/2011 5:52 PM, P T Withington wrote:
Change ptw-20110114-g1J by [email protected] on 2011-01-14 11:50:09 EST
in /Users/ptw/OpenLaszlo/trunk-3
for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk
Summary: Ensure implicit attribute events are in schema
Bugs Fixed: LPP-9675 Certain attributes not in schema (text/ontext)
Technical Reviewer: [email protected] (pending)
QA Reviewer: [email protected] (pending)
Details:
Tests:
test case from bug, smokecheck
Files:
M WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/js2doc/SchemaBuilder.java
M WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/compiler/ViewSchema.java
Changeset: http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/ptw-20110114-g1J.tar
