Sure -- that'd be great.
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Jim Grandy wrote: > We could add a hoverable property, that is (by default) true if clickable is > true. This wouldn't break backwards compatibility... > > On Dec 6, 2005, at 2:47 PM, Scott Evans wrote: > > > Currently, a view will receive onmouseover/out events only if it is > > clickable. I'd like to see this restriction removed: the two don't > > necessarily have anything to do with one another. > > > > There are cases where you want to simply say "is the mouse in this > > area?" and a non-clickable view would be a great way to do that. > > > > Thoughts? I guess this would break backwards compatiblity, but this > > design quirk has been forcing me to write some weird LZX to do simple > > things. > > > > > > > > gse > > _______________________________________________ > > Laszlo-user mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-user > _______________________________________________ Laszlo-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-user
