Of course, if you need to access a private parameter, perhaps the API
is not designed correctly. We are open to improvements!
On 2007-06-18, at 11:11 EDT, mt1 wrote:
Thank you Tucker.
I can see a lot of 'private' parameter in sample codes at ML and
Forum.
I think it is not good.
We will be careful from now on. ：＾）
mt1
P T Withington wrote:
Exactly as you say. Names that start with `_` are private by
convention and may be changed without notice. This is only a
convention, and is not currently enforced by the compiler, so you can
access those names, but you do so at your own risk. Private names may
be enforced in the future for efficiency, but they cannot be
relied on
for security.
On 2007-06-13, at 22:36 EDT, mt1 wrote:
Hi forks,
I have thinking, it is good to use private parameters in a LZX
application.
I mean they are the name of parameters, such like '_**' .
Because they are undocumented code, and i think it would be hard to
understand for
new comer to use them in a application. And also, there will not
announcement if they will
be deprecated.
I understand you can create a application to use them but in the
maintenance stage of it,
we come up against to chase it so hard.
What do you think of it and are there any good way to use private
parameters ?
Thank you.
mt1
