On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 10:57, Torsten Bronger wrote: > > It being at least _possible_ to charge $200 is exactly what Debian > > requires from Free Software. Besides the GPL, please consider the > > LPPL or any other free license approved at > > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/. > > The LPPL isn't OSI approved, and the LPPL in its current form was > rejected by Debian. The is a new version on its way though.
Right. That's why I listed the LPPL separately and it's not my favourite license. But latex2html having the same license as latex would be OK, IMHO. Feel free to remove LPPL from the above list. ;) bye, Roland
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ latex2html mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/latex2html
