On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, hooklee wrote: > Hi all, > > When one runs latex2tml with NO_SUBDIR=0, all graphics embedded with > \includegraphics cannot be processed. One has to copy all graphics into > the directory $DESTDIR\ and then re-run latex2html to get the graphics. > > I am puzzled why latex2html cannot be written slightly to make the thing > easier. In fact, latex2html can work well if the $DESTDIR\images.tex is > processed as follows: > --\graphicspath{{path}} => \graphicspath{{../path}} > or > --\includegraphics[...]{file.ext} => \includegraphics[...]{../file.ext} > (when \graphicspath doesn't appear in the source file) > > I am not familiar with perl programing, so perhaps the above ideas are > not practical. Could any one consider rewriting latex2html if it is > possible to add the functions? I think it will be very useful for all > users of latex2html.
Isn't it just a question of invoking LaTeX with the appropriate TEXINPUTS setting? Then images.tex doesn't need to be modified at all... Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D. '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! "The Sun will pass between the Earth and the Moon tonight for a total Lunar eclipse..." -- WCBS Radio Newsbrief, Oct 27 2004, 12:01 pm EDT _______________________________________________ latex2html mailing list latex2html@tug.org http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/latex2html