-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tom Haddon wrote: > On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 15:22 -0400, Gary Poster wrote: >> On Sep 1, 2009, at 3:17 PM, Gary Poster wrote: >> >>> On Sep 1, 2009, at 3:09 PM, Tom Haddon wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 14:34 -0400, Karl Fogel wrote: >>>>> Gary Poster <[email protected]> writes: >>>>>> But Tom, does touching devpad affect production too? If so, does >>>>>> someone know if production is using storm from sourcecode or a tgz? >>>>> Tom can give an authoritative answer about production, but we are >>>>> *supposed* to have no devpad dependencies in Launchpad proper >>>>> now. If >>>>> we have any, it's a bug. >>>> Do you mean I can remove all sourcecode directories? This isn't >>>> something I was aware of, but would be more than happy to if it can >>>> be >>>> confirmed. >>> >>> Karl is referring to how we build our developer instances. We don't >>> use devpad for that. We do use devpad for production. > > Ok, is this going to make our plans for a buildbot instance for > production problematic? The problem is that currently it would always > use the latest version of sourcecode dirs, when that might not actually > be what we want in production....
Configs can specify exact revisions, if needed. - -Rob -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkqdjd0ACgkQ42zgmrPGrq7sAACfbHHvymHUyOFHLgDNXRpFA/BE lvYAn1eBqj7879C5plNx/zNNlXFXl3WG =mnkC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
