Martin Pool wrote: > 2009/9/14 Jonathan Lange <[email protected]>: >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Tim Penhey <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:08:05 Martin Pool wrote: >>>> On the other hand the overall branch state (as opposed to the mp >>>> state) is generally boring and could probably be removed - but it may >>>> be worth checking how many people use it to verify that. I think the >>>> code team plan to drop it entirely.
>>> We seriously looked into dropping it completely, but there was a reasonable >>> number of people that do use the status. Primarily for experimental >>> branches, >>> but none the less, people do use it. >> I still think we can get the same effect through branch naming, and >> should ditch explicit branch status. Renaming a branch is quite disruptive if more than a single person know about it. There's no easy way to communicate the change. > Or possibly a very easily editable branch tags field. > > So the upshot for the bugs page seems to be: it should show the mp if > any, status and votes, and keep the other branch fields as they are. I like that I can currently view my branches sorted / filtered by status, to get an at a glance overview of what branches I have of various types. Max.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
