Hi Barry, У нед, 13. 09 2009. у 19:37 -0400, Barry Warsaw пише:
> OTOH, it seems to me that moin is the outlier here, so let me turn the > question around. Why should we use a different format for the wiki > than all our other documentation? Because that format might have more suitable and more expressive syntax for what we try to use the wiki for? I.e. https://dev.launchpad.net/VersionThreeDotO/Translations is not the kind of layout I'd care to see in our code documentation. It's not exactly straightforward to achieve with MoinMoin syntax, but it's possible. With rst, it'd be harder, if at all possible (including color coding). Oh yes, we are doing this in a wiki because we are lacking better tools for this, but as long as we are using a wiki (and we will be for the foreseeable future, for many different things), we should use what works best for our purpose. (I was looking at [1] as a reference: is that a good place to start in the first place? where is the documentation for the syntax as supported by moinmoin software we are running?) Cheers, Danilo [1]http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
