On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Michael Hudson <[email protected]> wrote: > James Westby wrote: >> Also, there has been some discussion of handling private branches. After >> some discussions yesterday it is now clear that this is important for >> Canonical, as well as supporting private recipes. > > Sure, that's not a surprise. But not in the first rollout please :) >
For private branches from the POV of the builder, sure. However, I'm going to start thinking about how privacy on recipes should work right now. jml _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
