On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 16:31 +0000, Julian Edwards wrote: > William Grant wrote: > > These backports will be required in the ~launchpad PPA and the EC2 > > images (as the test suite verifies 3.0 behaviour), and on at least > > cocoplum (Ubuntu ftpmaster), germanium (PPA ftpmaster) and iron (gina). > > Once the packages are in backports, I can file an RT request and have > them installed appropriately. We only care about the latest release and > the most recent LTS, so I don't expect we need to worry about > backporting to anywhere other than hardy. > > I'm not sure why you need the packages in the PPA though?
dpkg is not appropriate for the official backports project. I find it extremely unlikely that an official backport would be approved. > I don't know anything about EC2 images; if they don't do an "apt-get > upgrade" before running then yes, I guess they will need fixing. > > > All buildds except hppa need these too, but a fix for bug #476036 would > > remove that requirement > > I will also file an RT for this; Lamont can sort that out I guess. Note that the powerpc buildds still run Dapper, which could throw a spanner in the works. > > How would I best go about arranging this, preferably with minimal > > sysadmin heart attacks? > > Leave it to me! :) > > When do you expect the packages to show up in hardy-backports? As above, I don't. What now? _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
