-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stuart Bishop wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Jonathan Lange <[email protected]> wrote: >> How hard would it >> be to rename Build to BinaryPackageBuild? >> >> It sounds nominally easy to me, but Tim said that it's now hard >> because of replication.
> Nothing has changed because of replication. Just a DB patch as normal > renaming the table, constraints, attached sequences etc. I'm sure Tim got that idea from me, and I got that idea from these review comments: "I'm finding it is much better to drop and recreate tables than rename them - it causes problems with index names and constraints keeping old names and even triggered a Slony-I bug once where it was making naming assumptions that could be broken by renaming tables." https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~abentley/launchpad/messagejob/+merge/3610 What did I misunderstand? Aaron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAksP580ACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI3usgCePaKpR5VL88iOgIphQgYHgPW2 2usAnijGr5srbPsDT1+SP4s/xNVGj/WL =723V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
